Page 192 - 2024-Vol20-Issue2
P. 192

188 |                                                              Hussein & AL-Assfor

                  VI. CONCLUSION                                         international conference on communication and signal
                                                                         processing (ICCSP), pp. 0319–0322, IEEE, 2019.
In this work, a (24*24)-bit adjusted-Vedic multiplier (AVM)
with high speediness and low area consumption is proposed           [7] K. J. Ramesh et al., “A review: Multiply and accumulate
and implemented. The utilization of an enhanced design for               architectures for digital signal processing and digital
the Brent-Kung carry-select adder (EBK-CSLA) which used                  image processing,” Turkish Journal of Computer and
to perform the final addition has eliminated any propagation             Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), vol. 12, no. 12,
for the carry and thus, its highly reduced the delay of the              pp. 3797–3804, 2021.
multiplier. Moreover, the use of the improved XOR-gate to
design the multiplier is extremely reduced the area occupa-         [8] S. S. Mahakalkar and S. L. Haridas, “Design of high
tion and the delay of the design. The proposed (24*24)-bit               performance ieee754 floating point multiplier using
AVM offers efficient speed and area utilization for integra-             vedic mathematics,” in 2014 International Conference
tion into fast floating-point MAC module of the DSP systems.             on Computational Intelligence and Communication Net-
The proposed AVM achieves reduction in delay and FPGA                    works, vol. 52, pp. 985–988, IEEE, 2014.
area occupation by 33.16% and 42.42%, respectively for the
unpipelined design, and reduction in delay of 44.78% for            [9] G. Di Meo, G. Saggese, A. G. Strollo, D. De Caro, and
pipelined design compared with the existing designs.                     N. Petra, “Approximate floating-point multiplier based
                                                                         on static segmentation,” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 19,
          CONFLICT OF INTEREST                                           p. 3005, 2022.

The author have no conflict of relevant interest to this article.  [10] A. Kanhe, S. K. Das, and A. K. Singh, “Design and
                                                                         implementation of floating point multiplier based on
                     REFERENCES                                          vedic multiplication technique,” in 2012 international
                                                                         conference on communication, information & computing
 [1] K. Rajesh and G. U. Reddy, “Fpga implementation of                  technology (ICCICT), pp. 1–4, IEEE, 2012.
      multiplier-accumulator unit using vedic multiplier and
      reversible gates,” in 2019 Third International Confer-       [11] F. K. Al Assfor, I. S. Al-Furati, and A. T. Rashed, “Vedic-
      ence on Inventive Systems and Control (ICISC), pp. 467–            based squarers with high performance,” Indonesian Jour-
      471, IEEE, 2019.                                                   nal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics (IJEEI),
                                                                         vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 163–172, 2021.
 [2] N. Nagaraju and S. Ramesh, “Implementation of high
      speed and area efficient mac unit for industrial ap-         [12] N. J. Babu and R. Sarma, “A novel low power and
      plications,” Cluster Computing, vol. 22, no. Suppl 2,              high speed multiply-accumulate (mac) unit design for
      pp. 4511–4517, 2019.                                               floating-point numbers,” in 2015 International Confer-
                                                                         ence on Smart Technologies and Management for Com-
 [3] S. Havaldar and K. Gurumurthy, “Design of vedic ieee                puting, Communication, Controls, Energy and Materials
      754 floating point multiplier,” in 2016 IEEE Interna-              (ICSTM), pp. 411–417, IEEE, 2015.
      tional Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, In-
      formation & Communication Technology (RTEICT),               [13] S. S. Mohite, S. S. Nimbalkar, and M. Makarand, “32
      pp. 1131–1135, IEEE, 2016.                                         bit floating point vedic multiplier,” IOSR Journal of
                                                                         VLSI and Signal Processing (IOSR-JVSP), vol. 6, no. 2,
 [4] K. Paldurai and K. Hariharan, “Fpga implementation                  pp. 16–20, 2016.
      of delay optimized single precision floating point mul-
      tiplier,” in 2015 International Conference on Advanced       [14] M. A. Menon and R. Renjith, “Implementation of 24
      Computing and Communication Systems, pp. 1–5, IEEE,                bit high speed floating point vedic multiplier,” in 2017
      2015.                                                              International Conference on Networks & Advances in
                                                                         Computational Technologies (NetACT), pp. 453–457,
 [5] M. B. Murugesh, S. Nagaraj, J. Jayasree, and G. V. K.               IEEE, 2017.
      Reddy, “Modified high speed 32-bit vedic multiplier
      design and implementation,” in 2020 International Con-       [15] S. Javeed and S. S. Patil, “Low power high speed 24 bit
      ference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication               floating point vedic multiplier using cadence,” Int. Res.
      Systems (ICESC), pp. 929–932, IEEE, 2020.                          J. Eng. Tech.(IRJET), vol. 5, pp. 1771–1775, 2018.

 [6] A. S. K. Vamsi and S. Ramesh, “An efficient design            [16] G. Jha and E. John, “Performance analysis of single-
      of 16 bit mac unit using vedic mathematics,” in 2019               precision floating-point mac for deep learning,” in 2018
   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197