Page 187 - 2023-Vol19-Issue2
P. 187

183 |                                                                                Gaid & Ali

                                                TABLE I.
                        DIMENSIONS OF THE FINAL OPTIMIZED DESIGN

          Parameter     Dimension (mm)           Parameter           Dimension (mm)
       Sub length (Ls)            8           Feed length (Lf)               3.6
       Sub width (Ws)           8.5          Inset width (Wg)
                                             Inset length (Lg)              0.395
           Sub thick           0.508          Slot width (Sw)               1.002
       Pat length (Lp)          4.24    Horizontal Slot length (Sl)          0.2
       Pat width (Wp)          3.288    Vertical. Slot length (Lso)          1.4
         Pat thickness         0.035    p-shaped slot position (X)           0.8
       Feed width (Fw)        0.9992                                         1.5

                                                                   Fig. 3. The return loss performance for the design phases of
                                                                   the antenna.

    Fig. 2. The final optimized proposed tri-band antenna.         the Wg variable is adjusted to 0.195 mm, the return loss value
                                                                   at 28 GHz is reduced, causing the bandwidth surrounding 28
study was conducted on some critical factors. This section         GHz to vanish. However, the return loss levels at 38 GHz and
investigates the effects of varying the following variables on     56 GHz are improving. When the Wg value increases to 0.395
the proposed antenna’s performance: inset gap width (Wg),          mm, the return loss value at 28 GHz increases to around 15
I-shaped slot width (Sw), slot length (Lso), microstrip feed       dB while slightly decreasing at 38 GHz and 56 GHz to about
width (Fw), and p-shaped slot location (X). By adjusting these     18 dB and 26 dB, respectively. Notably, there is a significant
parameters, the antenna’s performance can be optimized to          increase in bandwidth at 56 GHz, which is beneficial as we
achieve the desired results.                                       aim to achieve the widest bandwidths possible. To determine
                                                                   if the return loss values and bandwidth continue to improve,
A. Effects of Inset Gap Width (Wg)                                 the Wg variable is further increased to 0.595 mm. However,
Figure 4 illustrates the return loss performance for various Wg    Fig. 4 shows that while the return loss values at 28 GHz and
values. It can be observed that this parameter affects the return  56 GHz increase, the return loss value at 38 GHz deteriorates,
loss value without impacting the resonant frequencies. When        and the bandwidth at 56 GHz also shrinks. If the Wg value
                                                                   continues to increase, it is expected that the bandwidth at 38
                                                                   GHz will vanish, and the bandwidth at 56 GHz will further
                                                                   contract. Therefore, the value of 0.395 mm is deemed the
                                                                   most suitable and ideal value for the Wg parameter.
   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192