Page 125 - 2024-Vol20-Issue2
P. 125

121 |                                                                                                 Assim & Mahmood

                                                             TABLE III.
                    THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE RECHERCHE LITERATURE

Ref Advantages                                                                       Disadvantages

                                                             1. Ignores the correlation between decision probability

       1. The kernel size in the first layer controls        and crucial frequency components in the internal

       retrieved features interpretability                   states of the network.

       and the trained models sensitivity.                   2. Mishandling the categorization of distinct seizure

[40] 2. Amplitude is the most significant feature in ictal sub-populations.

       prediction.                                           3. Signals from improperly classified segments

       3. Learning more complex frequency patterns           are often totally ictal or entirely interictal,

       would require a larger patient population.            with no clear transition between the immediately preceding

                                                             pre-itcal segments and seizure onsets.

       1. The smallest variance and the best classification

         accuracy are produced by hybrid input.              The classification accuracy performance deteriorated as the
[41] 2. Depth-wise separable convolution to reduce           training sample count decreased.

         the parameters in the network.

       3. Utilize regularization.

       1. The supervised deep convolutional autoencoder

       (SDCAE) training is faster than typical

          semi-supervised systems.                           1. Deep learning requires a large dataset;
          2. The number of parameters is reduced because     selecting 16 out of the 23 pediatric patients
[43] it uses convolutional layers instead of                 will increase the detection ratio.
          fully connected layers to learn features.          2. Do Not use any de-noising method to clean EEG signals.
          3. Auto Encoder (AE) supervised

       training is more effective in learning.

       4. Plotting with s(1s, 2s, 4s) time segments.

       1. Increased phase synchronization and the sample 1. Detecting epilepsy by traditional methods.

[44] entropy improve detection.                              2. select 23 from 24 pediatric patients using a small dataset.

       2. Using ICA and correlation p-value.                 3. The noise type is not mentioned.

       1. The results demonstrate that the single channel

       algorithm has an accuracy=86%.                        1. Training Parameters: affect the training process’s speed.

[45] 2. The multichannel combination technique               2. The Time-size frequency. It’s unclear whether

       improves accuracy by about 4% and                     the scaling process impacts how the model was trained.

       raises the TPR to 96.5%.

       1. Using 2-dimensional visual data based on           1. The requirement for a GPU computer with significant
                                                             memory and processing capability and accompanying
       graphical monitoring ensures high accuracy rates.     computational expense
                                                             2. Image noise suppression was skipped.
[46]   2. The extraction of features is done automatically.  3. A small quantity of training and testing data was used.
       3. With 14 million data points in

       1,000 categories, the Alex Net CNN model

       was successfully trained.

      1. Provide patients with epilepsy with a trustworthy

[47]  diagnosis of their seizures.                           1. Performance declines in the absence of augmentation.
      2. The Epileptic-Net model performs                    2. The difficulty in labeling EEG samples and their rarity.

      well when data are added.

      1. Low detection delay (1.0431s) is a feature of the 1. Among other pertinent aspects, statistical and nonlinear

      suggested technique.                                   patterns in EEG data can be employed to

[48] 2. The detection success rate is 99.95%, meaning all enhance detection.

      epileptic events may be                                2. A more effective multi-view learning

      identified in less than 10 seconds.                    process is required.
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130