Page 82 - IJEEE-2022-Vol18-ISSUE-1
P. 82
78 | Hamed & Yassin
VI. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS TABLE 2
COMPUTATION COST COMPARISION WITH OTHER
A. Computation Cost
RELATED WORKS
The computational cost is used to determine the time
complexity of the proposed scheme. Table 2 compares the Term Meaning Time needed
computational costs of the most important related schem and ????
our work and Figure 12, as well as our work with other ??? The time allotted to the crypto hash 0.0023 ms
related works. Table 3 shows key security feature ???????? function
comparisons between the proposed scheme and previous ????????
works. Moreover, depending on[38], the processing times for The processing time for the XOR Negligible
the basic functions are approximately as follows. Using the operation
rules in the following:
The processing time for a symmetric 0.0046 ms
Fig. 12: Computation Cost Comparison
encryption function.
The processing time for a 0.0046 ms
symmetric decryption Function.
??|| The processing time for the Negligible
Concatenation operation.
According to the aforementioned comparisons, the
suggested system has a lower time complexity (5 ??h +
2 ???????? + 5 ??? + 2???????? ) = 0.0299 than previous relevant
studies. We see that the suggested system has a fair mix of
performance and security aspects (see Table 3).
TABLE 3
COMPARING OF THE COMPUTATIONAL COST
Scheme Registration Phase Login and Authentication Phases Total Cost
Zhang et al. 4??h + 5??? + 5??? 18 ??h + 27 ??? + 19??? 22 ??h + 32??? + 24???
[29] 6 ??h + 6 ??? + 6 ??? + ˜ 0.0506
10 ??h + 20 ??? + 10 ???
Kaul et al. 1???????? 16 ??h + 26 ??? + 16 ??? + 1????????
[30] + 1???????? 13 ??h + 12 ??? + 6??? + 2???????? + 1????????
+ 2???????? ˜ 0.046
Yassin et al. 5 ??h + 2 ??? + 1???
[39] 2???????? + 2???????? + 6 ??h + 3 ??? + 18 ??h + 14 ??? + 7??? + 2????????
5 ??h + 3 ??? + 4 ??? 5??? + 2????????
Taher et al. ˜ 0.0598
[40]
11 ??h + 6??? + 9??? + 2????????
+ 2????????
˜ 0.0437
Our Scheme 2 ??h +2??|| 3??h+3 ??? + 2???????? + 2???????? 5 ??h + 2 ???????? + 5 ??? + 2????????
˜ 0.0299
