Cover
Vol. 20 No. 1 (2024)

Published: June 30, 2024

Pages: 1-15

Original Article

Design, Simulation, and Performance Evaluation of Reactive and Proactive Ad-Hoc Routing Protocols

Abstract

The primary goal of this study is to investigate and evaluate the performance of wireless Ad-Hoc routing protocols using the OPNET simulation tool, as well as to recommend the most effective routing strategies for the wireless mesh environment. Investigations have been testified to analyze the performance of the reactive and proactive Ad-Hoc routing protocols in different scenarios. Application and wireless metrics were configured that were used to test and evaluate the performance of routing protocols. The application metric includes web browsing metrics such as HTTP page response time, voice and video metrics such as end-to-end delay, and delay variation. The wireless network metrics include wireless media access delay, data dropped, wireless load, wireless retransmission attempts, and Packet Delivery Ratio. The simulations results show that the AODV overcome DSR and OLSR in terms of PDR (76%), wireless load (22.692 Mbps), voice delay variation (102.685 ms), HTTP page response time (15.317 sec), voice and video packet end-to-end delay (206.527 and 25.294 ms), wireless media access delay (90.150 ms), data dropped (10.003 Mbps), wireless load (22.692 Mbps), and wireless retransmission attempts (0.392 packets).

References

  1. I. F. Akyildiz, X. Wang, and W. Wang, “Wireless mesh networks: a survey,” Computer networks, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 445–487, 2005.
  2. S. A. Alabady and M. Salleh, “Overview of wireless mesh networks.,” Journal of Communications, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 586–599, 2013.
  3. M. Qian, X. Huang, and D. Tao, “Performance eval- uation of proactive and reactive routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics-Taiwan (ICCE- TW), pp. 1–2, IEEE, 2018.
  4. J. Bhosale, S. Zalte, and B. Jadhav, “Comparison of rout- ing protocols with performance parameters in manet us- ing ns3,” in International Conference on Advancements in Interdisciplinary Research, pp. 113–119, Springer, 2022.
  5. E. NesabGharamaleki and S. H. Hosseini Nejad, “Com- parative performance analysis of aodv, dsr, tora and olsr routing protocols in manet using opnet,” Journal of Ar- tificial Intelligence in Electrical Engineering, vol. 6, no. 22, pp. 27–34, 2017.
  6. R. Upadhyay, S. Kumar, and J. Wasim, “Performance of manet routing protocols with varying mobility speed 13 | Alabady & Hameed Sec Time in min and group mobility model,” Vidyabharati International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, pp. 28–32, 2021.
  7. S. Deshpande et al., “To simulate aodv, dsr, grp and olsr routing protocols of vanet and study the performance indicators using opnet modeler 14.5,” Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 3613–3617, 2021.
  8. S. T. Yousif, “Simulation and comparison of ad hoc net- works routing protocols based on opnet,” Iraqi Journal of Information and Communication Technology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 42–49, 2022.
  9. M. Zhang and S. Jia, “Opnet-based simulation of wire- less ad hoc network protocol,” in 2019 International Conference on Mathematics, Big Data Analysis and Sim- ulation and Modelling (MBDASM 2019), pp. 143–146, Atlantis Press, 2019.
  10. M. A. Jubair, S. H. Khaleefah, A. Budiyono, S. A. Mostafa, and A. Mustapha, “Performance evaluation of aodv and olsr routing protocols in manet environ- ment,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1277–1283, 2018.
  11. M. G. K. Alabdullah, B. M. Atiyah, K. S. Khalaf, and S. H. Yadgar, “Analysis and simulation of three manet routing protocols: A research on aodv, dsr & dsdv char- acteristics and their performance evaluation,” Periodi- cals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1228–1238, 2019.
  12. A. Aneiba and M. Melad, “Performance evaluation of aodv, dsr, olsr, and grp manet routing protocols using opnet,” International Journal of Future Computer and Communication, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 57, 2016.
  13. I. Nurcahyani and F. F. Laksono, “Performance analysis of ad-hoc on-demand distance vector (aodv) and dy- namic source routing (dsr) routing protocols during data broadcast storm problem in wireless ad hoc network,” in 2019 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA), pp. 29–34, IEEE, 2019.
  14. A. Shankar and L. Chelle, “Performance comparison of aodv, dsr, dsdv and olsr manet routing protocols,” Inter- national Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 218–223, 2016.
  15. R. R. Chandan, B. S. Kushwaha, and P. K. Mishra, “Per- formance evaluation of aodv, dsdv, olsr routing protocols using ns-3 simulator,” International Journal of Com- puter Network and Information Security, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 59–65, 2018.
  16. H. M. Haglan, S. A. Mostafa, N. Z. M. Safar, A. Mustapha, M. Z. Saringatb, H. Alhakami, and W. Al- hakami, “Analyzing the impact of the number of nodes on the performance of the routing protocols in manet environment,” Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 434–440, 2021.
  17. R. Zirmite et al., “Manet simulation through opnet,” Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Educa- tion (TURCOMAT), vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 3632–3637, 2021.
  18. A. A. Ajibesin, M. M. Kah, A. T. Ishaq, and C. A. Ajibesin, “Performance analysis of topology and desti- nation based routing protocols in mobile ad-hoc network using ns2,” in 2019 IEEE 13th International Confer- ence on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT), pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2019.
  19. R. Sachdeva and C. Monga, “Performance based com- parison of aodv and olsr routing protocols in manet using ftp and http traffics,” International Journal of Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJREAS), vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1–5, 2016.
  20. S. M. Alkahtani and F. Alturki, “Performance evaluation of different mobile ad-hoc network routing protocols in difficult situations,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 12, no. 1, 2021. 14 | Alabady & Hameed Packets /sec Time in min (a) Packets /sec Time in min (b) Packets /sec Time in min (c)
  21. P. K. Shrivastava and L. Vishwamitra, “Comparative analysis of proactive and reactive routing protocols in vanet environment,” Measurement: Sensors, vol. 16, p. 100051, 2021.
  22. A. C. Onuora, E. E. Essien, and F. U. Ogban, “Network size simulation-based study of routing protocols in wire- less ad hoc network,” IJISCS (International Journal of Information System and Computer Science), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 133–140, 2021.
  23. Y. Nwuku, A. Ajibesin, A. Ishaq, and A. Abel, “A com- prehensive analysis of proactive and reactive manet rout- ing protocols using ns3,” Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences Technology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2021.
  24. P. Nigam and A. Tiwari, “Performance evaluation of routing protocols in mobile ad-hoc networks,” Advances and Applications in Mathematical Sciences, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1305–1317, 2021.
  25. M. Abbas, H. M. T. Alhilfi, and T. Sutikno, “Perfor- mance evaluation of two models in the reactive routing protocol in manets,” Indonesian Journal of Electrical En- gineering and Computer Science, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 391– 397, 2021. 15 | Alabady & Hameed
  26. P. Sarao and M. Sharma, “Reactive and proactive route evaluation in manet.,” Journal of Communications, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 143–149, 2022.
  27. S. Mishra and G. K. Tiwari, “Analysis performance of different routing protocols for manets using ns2 sim- ulator,” International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, vol. 10, pp. 607– 613, 2022.
  28. R. Jisha, J. Joseph, and M. N. M. Basheer, “Compre- hensive study on mobile ad-hoc routing protocols: Olsr, aodv and dsdv,” in 2022 IEEE 3rd Global Conference for Advancement in Technology (GCAT), pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2022.
  29. K. Nazir, M. A. Habib, and M. Ahmad, “Evaluation of selective reactive routing protocols of mobile ad-hoc network,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Information Technology and Applications: ICITA 2021, pp. 647–657, Springer, 2022.
  30. A. A. A. Saif and K. Kumar, “Enhance the performance of aodv routing protocol in mobile ad-hoc networks,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2327, p. 012057, IOP Publishing, 2022.
  31. A. Mughaid, I. Obaidat, A. Aljammal, S. AlZubi, F. Quiam, D. Laila, A. Alzoubi, and L. Abualigah, “Sim- ulation and analysis performance of ad-hoc routing pro- tocols under ddos attack and proposed solution,” Inter- national Journal of Data and Network Science, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 757–764, 2023.
  32. R. Jisha, J. Joseph, and M. N. M. Basheer, “Compre- hensive study on mobile ad-hoc routing protocols: Olsr, aodv and dsdv,” in 2022 IEEE 3rd Global Conference for Advancement in Technology (GCAT), pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2022.
  33. M. S. Avhankar, D. Pawar, S. Majalekar, and S. Kedari, “Mobile ad hoc network routing protocols using opnet simulator,” International Journal on Recent and Innova- tion Trends in Computing and Communication, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2022.
  34. R. B. M. Abdelrahman, A. B. A. Mustafa, and A. A. Os- man, “A comparison between ieee 802.11 a, b, g, n and ac standards,” IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering (IOSR-JEC), vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 26–29, 2015.
  35. N. I. Sarkar and S. Gul, “The impact of wireless nodes on the performance of video streaming over a gigabit back- bone network,” in 2022 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), pp. 131–135, IEEE, 2022.