Page 238 - 2024-Vol20-Issue2
P. 238

234 |                                                              Abdul Zahra & Wali

more complicated (6–DOF) robot manipulator.                        [10] Z. Feng, L. Chen, C.-H. Chen, M. Liu, and M.-e. Yuan,
                                                                         “Motion planning for redundant robotic manipulators
              CONFLICT OF INTEREST                                       using a novel multi-group particle swarm optimization,”
                                                                         Evolutionary Intelligence, vol. 13, pp. 677–686, 2020.
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
                                                                   [11] F. Han and Y. Jia, “Sliding mode boundary control for
                     REFERENCES                                          a planar two-link rigid-flexible manipulator with input
                                                                         disturbances,” International Journal of Control, Automa-
 [1] J. Ciga´nek, M. Kocu´r, and S? . Koza´k, “Realization               tion and Systems, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 351–362, 2020.
      of robust controller algorithm using fpga,” IFAC-
      PapersOnLine, vol. 48, no. 25, pp. 156–161, 2015.            [12] C. Urrea, J. Kern, and J. Alvarado, “Design and eval-
                                                                         uation of a new fuzzy control algorithm applied to a
 [2] I.-C. Gros, D. Fodorean, and I.-C. Marginean, “Fpga                 manipulator robot,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 21,
      real-time implementation of a vector control scheme for            p. 7482, 2020.
      a pmsm used to propel an electric scooter,” in 2017 5th
      International Symposium on Electrical and Electronics        [13] A. Q. Al-Dujaili, A. Falah, A. J. Humaidi, D. A. Pereira,
      Engineering (ISEEE), pp. 1–5, IEEE, 2017.                          and I. K. Ibraheem, “Optimal super-twisting sliding
                                                                         mode control design of robot manipulator: Design and
 [3] H. Merah, L. Merah, N. Chaib, and A. Ali-Pacha, “De-                comparison study,” International Journal of Advanced
      signing and real-time fpga-based implementation of a               Robotic Systems, vol. 17, no. 6, p. 1729881420981524,
      chroma-key effect system using xilinx system generator,”           2020.
      International Journal of Future Computer and Commu-
      nication, vol. 11, no. 4, 2022.                              [14] W. A. Shutnan and T. Abdalla, “Optimal fuzzy-immune
                                                                         fractional pid control scheme for path tracking of robot
 [4] P. Chotikunnan and R. Chotikunnan, “Dual design pid                 manipulator,” Basrah Journal for Engineering Science,
      controller for robotic manipulator application,” Journal           vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2018.
      of Robotics and Control (JRC), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 23–34,
      2023.                                                        [15] J. G. Guarnizo and L. F. Nin˜o, “Clonal selection algo-
                                                                         rithm applied to object recognition in mobile robots.,” in
 [5] M. A. AFS¸ AR and H. ARSLAN, “Optimizing pid gains                  MLDM (1), pp. 49–62, 2019.
      of a vehicle using the state-of-the-art metaheuristic meth-
      ods,” Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and           [16] L. Bao, D. Kim, S.-J. Yi, and J. Lee, “Design of a sliding
      Smart Systems, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 107–117, 2023.                  mode controller with fuzzy rules for a 4-dof service
                                                                         robot,” International Journal of Control, Automation
 [6] K. Jayaswal, D. Palwalia, and S. Kumar, “Performance                and Systems, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 2869–2881, 2021.
      investigation of pid controller in trajectory control of
      two-link robotic manipulator in medical robots,” Journal     [17] J. Kumar, V. Kumar, and K. Rana, “Fractional-order
      of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 467–         self-tuned fuzzy pid controller for three-link robotic ma-
      478, 2021.                                                         nipulator system,” Neural Computing and Applications,
                                                                         vol. 32, pp. 7235–7257, 2020.
 [7] L. Chaouech, M. Soltani, and A. Chaari, “Fuzzy sliding
      mode controller design using scalar sign function for        [18] S. Ahmed, H. Wang, and Y. Tian, “Adaptive fractional
      a class of ts fuzzy models,” in 2019 6th International             high-order terminal sliding mode control for nonlinear
      Conference on Control, Decision and Information Tech-              robotic manipulator under alternating loads,” Asian Jour-
      nologies (CoDIT), pp. 1823–1828, IEEE, 2019.                       nal of Control, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1900–1910, 2021.

 [8] M. J. Mahmoodabadi, M. Taherkhorsandi, and                    [19] A. K. Abdul Zahra and T. Y. Abdalla, “Design of fuzzy
      A. Bagheri, “Optimal robust sliding mode tracking con-             super twisting sliding mode control scheme for unknown
      trol of a biped robot based on ingenious multi-objective           full vehicle active suspension systems using an artificial
      pso,” Neurocomputing, vol. 124, pp. 194–209, 2014.                 bee colony optimization algorithm,” Asian Journal of
                                                                         Control, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1966–1981, 2021.
 [9] R. Qi, Y. Tang, and K. Zhang, “An optimal visual servo
      trajectory planning method for manipulators based on         [20] Q. Pan, X. Li, and J. Fei, “Adaptive fuzzy neural network
      system nondeterministic model,” Robotica, vol. 40, no. 6,          harmonic control with a super-twisting sliding mode
      pp. 1665–1681, 2022.                                               approach,” Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 7, p. 1063, 2022.
   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243