Page 193 - 2023-Vol19-Issue2
P. 193

189 |                                                                                                         Gaid & Ali

                                            TABLE II.
           COMPARISON WITH SOME RECENTLY PUBLISHED LITERATURE

   Ref.    Antenna Size mm3     Frequency (GHz)        S11 (dB)           Gain (dBi)          BW (GHz)        Rad Efficiency %
    [23]       7 × 7 × 1.28        23.52, 28,39    = -43, = -30            5.51, 4.55         1.16, 0.634            87, 81
    [24]                           28.13, 37.97      - 25.3, - 11.2        7.27, 8.46        0.231, 0.090
    [25]   7.5 × 27.06 × 0.254         27.77                                                                       88.3, 86.3
    [26]      8 × 8 × 0.787          28, 38, 61         - 25.45                 7                 1.88                 74
    [27]     5.1 × 5 × 0.254           28,,38       -12, - 22, - 12      7.2, 7.22, 6.5     0.84, 0.37, 0.9
    [28]                               60.06                              7.03, 7.368                              86, 91, 85
    [29]   20.4 × 26.4 × 0.508      25.98, 28.2        - 30, -42                                0.7, 12              96, 95
    [30]     12.9 × 14 × 1.6           28, 38             - 24                8.62               12.11                82.2
This work   20 × 16.5 × 0.508     27.9, 38.4, 56                          8.63, 11.26          0.55, 1.1
             7.5 × 8.8 × 0.25                        - 24.1, - 25.5         6.6, 5.86         1.23, 1.06           95.9, 95.4
             8 × 8.5 × 0.508                         - 34.5, - 27.3     7.96, 6.82, 7.93  1.26, 1.08, 12.015            -
                                                  - 15.4, - 18, - 26.4
                                                                                                                   88, 84, 90

HFSS and validated using CST, demonstrating a reasonable                2013 IEEE 77th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC
agreement between the simulation results. Overall, the pro-             Spring), pp. 1–6.
posed antenna offers a compact and efficient solution for 5G
applications in the mentioned frequency bands. In the future,       [5] Y. Banday, G. M. Rather, and G. R. Begh, “Effect of
we plan to further enhance the antenna’s performance. Un-                atmospheric absorption on millimeter wave frequencies
fortunately, due to the limited availability of fabrication and          for 5g cellular networks,” IET Communications, vol. 13,
measurement facilities at our university and the ongoing civil           no. 3, pp. 265–270, 2019.
war in our country, we were unable to fabricate and measure
the antenna ourselves. Therefore, we aim to collaborate with        [6] K.-L. A. Yau, J. Qadir, C. Wu, M. A. Imran, and
other organizations to manufacture and measure the antenna,              M. H. Ling, “Cognition-inspired 5g cellular networks:
to validate its characteristics.                                        A review and the road ahead,” IEEE Access, vol. 6,
                                                                         pp. 35072–35090, 2018.

              CONFLICT OF INTEREST                                   [7] R. N. Mitra and D. P. Agrawal, “5g mobile technology:
                                                                          A survey,” ICT Express, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 132–137, 2015.
The authors have no conflict of relevant interest to this article.
                                                                     [8] P. Pirinen, “A brief overview of 5g research activities,”
                     REFERENCES                                           in In 1st International Conference on 5G for Ubiquitous
                                                                          Connectivity, pp. 17–22, IEEE.
 [1] E. Dahlman, G. Mildh, S. Parkvall, J. Peisa, J. Sachs,
      Y. Selen, and J. Skold, “5g wireless access: require-          [9] A. N. Uwaechia and N. M. Mahyuddin, “A compre-
      ments and realization,” IEEE Communications Maga-                   hensive survey on millimeter wave communications for
      zine, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 42–47, 2014.                             fifth-generation wireless networks: Feasibility and chal-
                                                                          lenges,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 62367–62414, 2020.
 [2] H. A. Diawuo and Y.-B. Jung, “Broadband proximity-
      coupled microstrip planar antenna array for 5g cellular       [10] P. K. Gkonis, P. T. Trakadas, and D. I. Kaklamani, “A
      applications,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation               comprehensive study on simulation techniques for 5g
      Letters, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1286–1290, 2018.                       networks: State of the art results, analysis, and future
                                                                          challenges,” Electronics, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 468, 2020.
 [3] M. Omar, A. S. M. Mohamadariff Othman, S. Kamal,
      M. F. B. Ain, R. Hussin, F. Najmi, S. A. Sundi, Z. A. Ah-     [11] L. Wei, R. Q. Hu, Y. Qian, and G. Wu, “Key elements to
      mad, U. Ullah, and M. Faiz, “Mathematical model on the              enable millimeter wave communications for 5g wireless
      effects of conductor thickness on the center frequency              systems,” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 21, no. 6,
      at 28 ghz for the performance of microstrip patch an-               pp. 136–143, 2014.
      tenna using air substrate for 5g application,” Alexandria
      Engineering Journal, vol. 60, pp. 5265–5273, 2021.            [12] Y. B. Zikria, S. W. Kim, M. K. Afzal, H. Wang, and M. H.
                                                                          Rehmani, “5g mobile services and scenarios: Challenges
 [4] S. Mathew, K. Wang, Y. Azar, G. N. Wong, R. Mayzus,                  and solutions,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 10, p. 3626,
      H. Zhao, J. K. Schulz, S. Sun, F. Gutierrez, and T. S.              2018.
      Rappaport, “28 ghz angle of arrival and angle of de-
      parture analysis for outdoor cellular communications          [13] T. S. Rappaport, S. Sun, R. Mayzus, H. Zhao, Y. Azar,
      using steerable beam antennas in new york city,” in In              K. Wang, G. N. Wong, J. K. Schulz, and M. Samimi,
   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196