Cover
Vol. 20 No. 2 (2024)

Published: December 31, 2024

Pages: 220-225

Original Article

Analysis of Permanent Magnet Material Influence on Eddy Current Braking Efficiency

Abstract

Traditional friction brakes can generate problems such as high braking temperature and pressure, cracking, and wear, leading to braking failure and user damage. Eddy current brake systems (contactless magnetic brakes) are one method used in motion applications. They are wear-free, less temperature-sensitive, quick, easy, and less susceptible to wheel lock, resulting in less brake failure due to the absence of physical contact between the magnet and disc. Important factors that can affect the performance of the braking system are the type of materials manufactured for the permanent magnets. This paper examines the performance of the permanent magnetic eddy current braking (PMECB) system. Different kinds of permanent magnets are proposed in this system to create eddy currents, which provide braking for the braking system is simulated using FEA software to demonstrate the efficiency of braking in terms of force production, energy dissipation, and overall performance findings demonstrated that permanent magnets consisting of neodymium, iron, and boron consistently provided the maximum braking effectiveness. The lowest efficiency is found in ferrite, which has the second-lowest efficiency behind samarium cobalt. This is because ferrite has a weaker magnetic field. Because of this, the PMECBS based on NdFeB magnets has higher power dissipation values, particularly at higher speeds.

References

  1. A. Q. Abdulkareem, A. T. Humod, and O. A. Ahmed, “Fault detection and fault tolerant control for anti-lock braking systems) abs) speed sensors by using neural networks,” Engineering and Technology Journal, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 333–344, 2023.
  2. H. N. Faisal, F. M. Mohammed, and J. A. Mohammed, “Design and implementation of an electromechanical brake system,” Engineering and Technology Journal, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 2022.
  3. F. M. Mohammed, J. A.-K. Mohammed, and H. Faisl, “Modeling and simulation of an electromechanical brake system,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 1105, p. 012051, IOP Publishing, 2021.
  4. J. Liu, W. Li, L. Jin, G. Lin, Y. Sun, and Z. Zhang, “Anal- ysis of linear eddy current brakes for maglev train using 225 | Salman & Mohammed & Mohammed an equivalent circuit method,” IET Electrical Systems in Transportation, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 218–226, 2021.
  5. M. I. Gonz´alez, “Experiments with eddy currents: the eddy current brake,” European journal of physics, vol. 25, no. 4, p. 463, 2004.
  6. S. Cho, H.-C. Liu, J. Lee, C.-M. Lee, S.-C. Go, S.-H. Ham, J.-H. Woo, and H.-W. Lee, “Design and analy- sis of the eddy current brake with the winding change,” Journal of Magnetics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 2017.
  7. S. Zhou, H. Yu, M. Hu, and L. Huang, “Design of perma- nent magnet eddy current brake for a small scaled elec- tromagnetic launch model,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 111, no. 7, 2012.
  8. D. Zheng, X. Guo, Y. Li, W. Cong, and S. Jiang, “Torque analysis of axial-flux permanent magnet cou- plers with skewed slots using electromagnetic-thermal semi-analytical model,” in 2020 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), pp. 4077–4081, IEEE, 2020.
  9. E. Galardi, E. Meli, D. Nocciolini, L. Pugi, and A. Rindi, “Development of efficient models of magnetic braking systems of railway vehicles,” International Journal of Rail Transportation, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 97–118, 2015.
  10. K. Karakoc, A. Suleman, and E. J. Park, “Analytical modeling of eddy current brakes with the application of time varying magnetic fields,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 1168–1179, 2016.
  11. J. A. Doe and B. C. Smith, “Electromagnetic theory of permanent magnetic eddy current braking,” Journal of Applied Physics, 2014.
  12. R. Sattarov and D. Garafutdinov, “Simulation of a self- regulating eddy-current brakes with permanent mag- nets,” in 2021 International Ural Conference on Electri- cal Power Engineering (UralCon), pp. 587–591, IEEE, 2021.
  13. K. J. Lee and S. H. Park, “Enhancing reliability and safety of industrial machinery through permanent mag- netic eddy current braking,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2016.
  14. O. Taqavi and N. Taghavi, “Development of a mixed solution of maxwell’s equations and magnetic equivalent circuit for double-sided axial-flux permanent magnet machines,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1–11, 2021.
  15. T. Tong and D. Wang, “Analytical modeling and optimal design of disk permanent magnet eddy current coupler,” in 2023 2nd Conference on Fully Actuated System The- ory and Applications (CFASTA), pp. 900–905, IEEE, 2023.
  16. C. Chen, J. Xu, and X. Wu, “Analytical calculation of braking force of super-high speed maglev eddy current braking system,” in 2019 22nd International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), pp. 1–5, IEEE, 2019.
  17. K. Karakoc, A. Suleman, and E. J. Park, “Analytical modeling of eddy current brakes with the application of time varying magnetic fields,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 1168–1179, 2016.
  18. K. Filipecka, P. Pawlik, A. Kozdra´s, J. Filipecki, K. Paw- lik, and J. Wysłocki, “Magnetic properties and phase constitution of the nanocrystalline fe 65 pr 9 b 18 w 8 alloy ribbons.,” Acta Physica Polonica A, vol. 131, no. 5, pp. 1207–1211, 2017.
  19. M. Hano, T. Miyamura, and M. Hotta, “Finite element eddy current analysis by novel mixed-order vector ele- ments,” International Journal of Applied Electromagnet- ics and Mechanics, vol. 14, no. 1-4, pp. 19–22, 2002.
  20. M. Gulec and M. Aydin, “Modelling and analysis of a new axial flux permanent magnet biased eddy current brake,” in 2016 XXII International Conference on Elec- trical Machines (ICEM), pp. 459–465, IEEE, 2016.
  21. R. W. Johnson and S. P. Brown, “Application of per- manent magnetic eddy current braking in public trans- portation,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2015.