Cover
Vol. 18 No. 1 (2022)

Published: June 30, 2022

Pages: 139-143

Original Article

A Comparison of COIVD-19 Cases Classification Based on Machine Learning Approaches

Oqbah Salim Atiyah 1 Saadi Hamad Thalij
1College of computer science, University of Tikrit, Iraq
History
  • Received: March 12, 2022
  • Revised: April 18, 2022
  • Accepted: April 23, 2022
  • Available Online: April 25, 2022
DOI

https://doi.org/10.37917/ijeee.18.1.15

Abstract

COVID-19 emerged in 2019 in china, the worldwide spread rapidly, and caused many injuries and deaths among humans. Accurate and early detection of COVID-19 can ensure the long-term survival of patients and help prohibit the spread of the epidemic. COVID-19 case classification techniques help health organizations quickly identify and treat severe cases. Algorithms of classification are one the essential matters for forecasting and making decisions to assist the diagnosis, early identification of COVID-19, and specify cases that require to intensive care unit to deliver the treatment at appropriate timing. This paper is intended to compare algorithms of classification of machine learning to diagnose COVID-19 cases and measure their performance with many metrics, and measure mislabeling (false-positive and false-negative) to specify the best algorithms for speed and accuracy diagnosis. In this paper, we focus onto classify the cases of COVID-19 using the algorithms of machine learning. we load the dataset and perform dataset preparation, pre-processing, analysis of data, selection of features, split of data, and use of classification algorithm. In the first using four classification algorithms, (Stochastic Gradient Descent, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Naive Bayes), the outcome of algorithms accuracy respectively was 99.61%, 94.82% ,98.37%,96.57%, and the result of execution time for algorithms respectively were 0.01s, 0.7s, 0.20s, 0.04. The Stochastic Gradient Descent of mislabeling was better. Second, using four classification algorithms, (eXtreme-Gradient Boosting, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machines, K_Nearest Neighbors), the outcome of algorithms accuracy was 98.37%, 99%, 97%, 88.4%, and the result of execution time for algorithms respectively were 0.18s, 0.02s, 0.3s, 0.01s. The Decision Tree of mislabeling was better. Using machine learning helps improve allocate medical resources to maximize their utilization. Classification algorithm of clinical data for confirmed COVID-19 cases can help predict a patient's need to advance to the ICU or not need by using a global dataset of COVID-19 cases due to its accuracy and quality.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdulkareem, N.M., et al., "COVID-19 world vaccination progress using machine learning classification algorithms", Qubahan Academic Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp.100-105, 2021.
  2. Abdulqader, D.M., A.M. Abdulazeez, and D.Q. Zeebaree, "Machine learning supervised algorithms of gene selection: A review", Machine Learning, vol. 62, no. 3, 2020.
  3. Alsharif, M., et al., "Artificial intelligence technology for diagnosing COVID-19 cases: A review of substantial issues", Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci, vol. 24, pp.9226- 9233, 2021.
  4. Siddique, S. and J.C. Chow, "Machine learning in healthcare communication. Encyclopedia", vol. 1, no. 1, pp.220-239, 2021.
  5. Kumar, A., P.K. Gupta, and A. Srivastava, "A review of modern technologies for tackling COVID-19 pandemic", Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, vol. 14, no. 4, pp.569-573, 2020.
  6. Bao, Y., et al., "2019-nCoV epidemic: address mental health care to empower society", The Lancet, vol. 395, no. 10224, pp.e37-e38, 2020.
  7. Sarwar, A., et al., "Diagnosis of diabetes type-II using hybrid machine learning based ensemble model", International Journal of Information Technology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp.419-428, 2020.
  8. Du, L., et al., "The spike protein of SARS-CoV—a target for vaccine and therapeutic development", Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp.226-236, 2009.
  9. Bayat, V., et al., "A severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (sars-cov-2) prediction model from standard laboratory tests", Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 73, no. 9, pp.e2901-e2907, 2021.
  10. Zhou, Y., et al., "A new predictor of disease severity in patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan", China. MedRxiv, 2020.
  11. Atiyah, O.S. and S.H. Thalij, "Evaluation of COVID- 19 Cases based on Classification Algorithms in Machine Learning", Webology, vol. 19, no. 1, 2022.
  12. O. S. Atiyah, S.H.T., "Using Classification Algorithms in Machine Learning for COVID-19 Cases Diagnosis", International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 7, no. 1, pp.6472-6478, 2022.
  13. https://www.kaggle.com / S % C3 % ADrio-Libanes/ covid19.
  14. Mahboob, T., S. Irfan, and A. Karamat, "A machine learning approach for student assessment in E-learning using Quinlan's C4. 5", Naive Bayes and Random Forest algorithms. in 2016 19th International Multi-Topic Conference (INMIC). 2016.
  15. Bhandari, S., et al., "Logistic regression analysis to predict mortality risk in COVID-19 patients from routine hematologic parameters", Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, vol. 12, no. 2, 2020.
  16. LeCun, Y.A., et al., Efficient backprop, in Neural networks: Tricks of the trade. 2012, Springer. p. 9-48.
  17. Samuel, J., et al., "Covid-19 public sentiment insights and machine learning for tweets classification", Information, vol. 11, no. 6, 2020.
  18. Wang, Y., et al., "A Comparative Assessment of Credit Risk Model Based on Machine Learning a case study of bank loan data", Procedia Computer Science, vol. 174, pp.141-149, 2020.
  19. Noori, N.A. and A.A. Yassin, "Towards for Designing Intelligent Health Care System Based on Machine Learning", Iraqi Journal for Electrical & Electronic Engineering, vol. 17, no. 2, 2021.
  20. Lodhi, H., et al., "Text classification using string kernels", in NIPS. 2000.
  21. Xu, Y., et al., "Research on a mixed gas classification algorithm based on extreme random tree", Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 9, 2019.
  22. Piryonesi, S.M. and T.E. El-Diraby, "Role of data analytics in infrastructure asset management: Overcoming data size and quality problems", Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, vol. 146, no. 2, 2020.
  23. Rokach, L. and O. Maimon, "Top-down induction of decision trees classifiers-a survey", IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), vol. 35, no. 4, pp.476-487, 2005.