Cover
Vol. 16 No. Special Issue (2020)

Published: June 30, 2020

Pages: 139-151

Conference Article

Fair and Balance Demand Response application in Distribution Networks

Abstract

The unprogrammed penetration for the loads in the distribution networks make it work in an unbalancing situation that leads to unstable operation for those networks. the instability coming from the imbalance can cause many serious problems like the inefficient use of the feeders and the heat increased in the distribution transformers. The demands response can be regarded as a modern solution for the problem by offering a program to decreasing the consumption behavior for the program's participators in exchange for financial incentives in specific studied duration according to a direct order from the utility. The paper uses a new suggested algorithm to satisfy the direct load control demand response strategy that can be used in solving the unbalancing problem in distribution networks. The algorithm procedure has been simulated in MATLAB 2018 to real data collected from the smart meters that have been installed recently in Baghdad. The simulation results of applying the proposed algorithm on different cases of unbalancing showed that it is efficient in curing the unbalancing issue based on using the demand response strategy.

References

  1. S. S. Reka and V. Ramesh, “Demand response scheme with electricity market prices for residential sector using stochastic dynamic optimization,” in 2016 Biennial International Conference on Power and Energy Systems: Towards Sustainable Energy (PESTSE), 2016, pp. 1–6.
  2. F. Kamyab, M. Amini, S. Sheykhha, M. Hasanpour, and M. M. Jalali, “Demand response program in smart grid using supply function bidding mechanism,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1277–1284, 2015.
  3. M. H. Yaghmaee, A. Leon-Garcia, and M. Moghaddassian, “On the performance of distributed and cloud-based demand response in smart grid,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 5403–5417, 2017.
  4. P. Du, N. Lu, and H. Zhong, Demand Response in Smart Grids. 2019.
  5. M. Parvania, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, and M. Shahidehpour, “ISO’s optimal strategies for scheduling the hourly demand response in day-ahead markets,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2636–2645, 2014.
  6. D. T. Nguyen, M. Negnevitsky, and M. de Groot, “Market-based demand response scheduling in a deregulated environment,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1948–1956, 2013.
  7. S. Paul, “Day Ahead Bi-Level Direct Load Control in Smart Residential Apartment Building : A Stackelberg Game Approach,” no. September, 2019.
  8. F. Ruelens, B. J. Claessens, P. Vrancx, F. Spiessens, and G. Deconinck, “Direct Load Control of Thermostatically Controlled Loads Based on Sparse Observations Using Deep Reinforcement Learning,” vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 423–432, 2017.
  9. J. M. Lujano-Rojas, G. Zubi, R. Dufo-López, J. L. Bernal-Agustín, E. García-Paricio, and J. P. S. Catalão, “Contract design of direct-load control programs and their optimal management by genetic algorithm,” Energy, vol. 186, 2019.
  10. A. R. Jordehi, “Optimisation of demand response in electric power systems, a review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 103, no. September 2017, pp. 308–319, 2019.
  11. I. H. Al-Kharsan, “a New Strategy for Phase Swapping Load Balancing Relying on a Meta-Heuristic Mogwo Algorithm,” J. Mech. Contin. Math. Sci., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 84–102, 2020.
  12. I. H. Al-Kharsan, A. F. Marhoon, and J. R. Mahmood, “The Balancing of Secondary Distribution Feeders by Two Techniques GWO and PSO Applied in Baghdad, Comparative Study,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 745, no. 1, 2020.