Facial retouching, also referred to as digital retouching, is the process of modifying or enhancing facial characteristics in digital images or photographs. While it can be a valuable technique for fixing flaws or achieving a desired visual appeal, it also gives rise to ethical considerations. This study involves categorizing genuine and retouched facial images from the standard ND-IIITD retouched faces dataset using a transfer learning methodology. The impact of different primary optimization algorithms—specifically Adam, RMSprop, and Adadelta—utilized in conjunction with a fine-tuned ResNet50 model is examined to assess potential enhancements in classification effectiveness. Our proposed transfer learning ResNet50 model demonstrates superior performance compared to other existing approaches, particularly when the RMSprop and Adam optimizers are employed in the fine-tuning process. By training the transfer learning ResNet50 model on the ND-IIITD retouched faces dataset with the ”ImageNet” weight, we achieve a validation accuracy of 98.76%, a training accuracy of 98.32%, and an overall accuracy of 98.52% for classifying real and retouched faces in just 20 epochs. Comparative analysis indicates that the choice of optimizer during the fine-tuning of the transfer learning ResNet50 model can further enhance the classification accuracy.
Novel Coronavirus (Covid-2019), which first appeared in December 2019 in the Chinese city of Wuhan. It is spreading rapidly in most parts of the world and becoming a global epidemic. It is devastating, affecting public health, daily life, and the global economy. According to the statistics of the World Health Organization on August 11, the number of cases of coronavirus (Covid-2019) reached nearly 17 million, and the number of infections globally distributed among most European countries and most countries of the Asian continent, and the number of deaths from the Corona virus reached 700 thousand people around the world. . It is necessary to detect positive cases as soon as possible in order to prevent the spread of this epidemic and quickly treat infected patients. In this paper, the current literature on the methods used to detect Covid is presented. In these studies, the research that used different techniques of artificial intelligence to detect COVID-19 was reviewed as the convolutionary neural network (ResNet50, ResNet101, ResNet152, InceptionV3 and Inception-ResNetV2) were proposed for the identification of patients infected with coronavirus pneumonia using chest X-ray radiographs By using 5-fold cross validation, three separate binary classifications of four grades (COVID-19, normal (healthy), viral pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia) were introduced. It has been shown that the pre-trained ResNet50 model offers the highest classification performance (96.1 percent accuracy for Dataset-1, 99.5 percent accuracy for Dataset-2 and 99.7 percent accuracy for Dataset-2) based on the performance results obtained.
Brain tumors are collections of abnormal tissues within the brain. The regular function of the brain may be affected as it grows within the region of the skull. Brain tumors are critical for improving treatment options and patient survival rates to prevent and treat them. The diagnosis of cancer utilizing manual approaches for numerous magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images is the most complex and time-consuming task. Brain tumor segmentation must be carried out automatically. A proposed strategy for brain tumor segmentation is developed in this paper. For this purpose, images are segmented based on region-based and edge-based. Brain tumor segmentation 2020 (BraTS2020) dataset is utilized in this study. A comparative analysis of the segmentation of images using the edge-based and region-based approach with U-Net with ResNet50 encoder, architecture is performed. The edge-based segmentation model performed better in all performance metrics compared to the region-based segmentation model and the edge-based model achieved the dice loss score of 0. 008768, IoU score of 0. 7542, f1 score of 0. 9870, the accuracy of 0. 9935, the precision of 0. 9852, recall of 0. 9888, and specificity of 0. 9951.