Cover
Vol. 8 No. 1 (2012)

Published: November 30, 2012

Pages: 45-53

Original Article

Region-Based Fractional Wavelet Transform Using Post Processing Artifact Reduction

Abstract

Wavelet-based algorithms are increasingly used in the source coding of remote sensing, satellite and other geospatial imagery. At the same time, wavelet-based coding applications are also increased in robust communication and network transmission of images. Although wireless multimedia sensors are widely used to deliver multimedia content due to the availability of inexpensive CMOS cameras, their computational and memory resources are still typically very limited. It is known that allowing a low-cost camera sensor node with limited RAM size to perform a multi-level wavelet transform, will in return limit the size of the acquired image. Recently, fractional wavelet filter technique became an interesting solution to reduce communication energy and wireless bandwidth, for resource-constrained devices (e.g. digital cameras). The reduction in the required memory in these fractional wavelet transforms is achieved at the expense of the image quality. In this paper, an adaptive fractional artifacts reduction approach is proposed for efficient filtering operations according to the desired compromise between the effectiveness of artifact reduction and algorithm simplicity using some local image features to reduce boundaries artifacts caused by fractional wavelet. Applying such technique on different types of images with different sizes using CDF 9/7 wavelet filters results in a good performance.

References

  1. M. AlNuaimi, F. Sallabi, and K. Shuaib, “A Survey of Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks Challenges and Solutions,” International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology, pp. 191–196, April 2011.
  2. B. Tavli, K. Bicakci, R. Zilan, and J. M. Barcelo-Ordinas, “A Survey of Visual Sensor Network Platforms,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2011.
  3. S. Rein and M. Reisslein, “Low-Memory Wavelet Transforms for Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 291–307, 2010.
  4. P. A. Babu and K. V. R. Prasad, “Image Interpolation Using 5/3 Lifting Scheme Approach,” SIPIJ, vol. 2, no. 1, 2011.
  5. J. Oliver and M. P. Malumbres, “On the Design of Fast Wavelet Transform Algorithms with Low Memory Requirements,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 237–248, 2008.
  6. C. Chrysafis and A. Ortega, “Line-Based, Reduced Memory, Wavelet Image Compression,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 378–389, 2000.
  7. Y. Bao and C. Kuo, “Design of Wavelet-Based Image Codec in Memory Constrained Environment,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., vol. 11, no. 5, 2011.
  8. R. Singh, R. Verma, and S. Kumar, “JPEG2000: Wavelet Based Image Compression,” EE678 Wavelets Application Assignment 1, IIT Bombay.
  9. T. Acharya and A. K. Ray, “Image Processing Principles and Applications,” Prentice Hall, NJ, 2005, pp. 79–90.
  10. D. S. Taubman and M. W. Marcellin, “JPEG2000: Standard for Interactive Imaging,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 90, no. 8, 2002.
  11. V. Lecuire, C. Duran-Faundez, and N. Krommenacker, “Energy-Efficient Transmission of Wavelet-Based Images in Wireless Sensor Networks,” EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, vol. 2007, no. 2, pp. 15–15, 2007.
  12. Y. Chen, Y. Chang, and W. Yen, “Design a Deblocking Filter With Three Separate Modes in DCT-Based Coding,” J. Visual Commun. Image Representation, vol. 19, pp. 231–244, 2008.
  13. S. Singh, V. Kumar, and H. K. Verma, “Reduction of Blocking Artifacts in JPEG Compressed Images,” Digital Signal Processing, vol. 17, pp. 225–243, 2007.